Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Military sciences, National security and Security of the State Border

August 18, 2023; Cambridge, UK: V International Scientific and Practical Conference «EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF TODAY: INTERSECTORAL ISSUES AND DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCES»


JUSTIFICATION OF THE TYPE AND VOLUME OF RESERVE OF ELEMENTS RECONNAISSANCE-FIRE SYSTEM


DOI
https://doi.org/10.36074/logos-18.08.2023.23
Published
29.08.2023

Abstract

The results of the analysis military conflicts of the last decades [1–4] indicate an increase in the share of tasks involving the destruction of targets by reconnaissance-fire systems (RFS). However, as the weight of these systems increases, the volume of measures to counteract them increases [3–5]. According to [6], the more effective a weapon sample is, the more efforts are made to neutralize it. That is, the greater the role RFS in the confrontation, the more effort is devoted to fighting them, therefore, the less stable its functioning will be, which in turn will lead to a decrease in the effectiveness of their use.

References

  1. Harris, C., Kagan, F. (2018). Introduction. Russia’s military posture: ground forces order of battle. Institute for the Study of War, 9–11. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep17469
  2. Czuperski, M., Herbst, J., Higgins, E., Polyakova, A., Wilson, D. (2015). Hiding in plain sight: Putinʹs War in Ukraine. Atlantic Council. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep03631
  3. Majstrenko, O. V., Bubenshсhykov, R. V., Bondar, R. V., Poplinskyi, O. V. (2018). Determination of constituents of fire defeat of opponent by the method of construction “tree of aims”. Modern Information Technologies in the Sphere of Security and Defence, 32 (2), 45–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.33099/2311-7249/2018-32-2-45-50
  4. Nichol, J. (2009) Russia-Georgia Conflict in August 2008: Context and Implications for U.S. Interests. Congressional Research Service. Available at: https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a496306.pdf
  5. Majstrenko, O. V., Prokopenko, V. V., Makeev, V. I., Ivanyk, E. G. (2020). Analytical methods of calculation of powered and passive trajectory of reactive and rocket-assisted projectiles. Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, 2, 173–182. doi: https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-3274-2020-2-18
  6. Luttwak, E. N. (2001). Strategy: The Logic of War and Peace, Revised and Enlarged Edition. Harvard University Press, 320. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1c7zfsc
  7. DSTU 2860-94. Dependability of Technics. Terms and definitions. Available at: https://dnaop.com/html/2273/doc-%D0%94%D0 %A1%D0%A2%D0%A3_2860-94
  8. Belyaev, Yu. K., Bogatyrev, V. A., Bolotin, V. V. et. al. (1985). Nadezhnost’ tekhnicheskih sistem. Moscow: Radio i svyaz’, 608.
  9. Sadchikov, P. I., Prihod’ko, Yu. G. (1983). Metody otsenki nadezhnosti i obespecheniya ustoychivosti funktsionirovaniya programm. Moscow: Znanie, 102.
  10. Golinkevich, T. A. (1985). Prikladnaya teoriya nadezhnosti. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 168.