Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Finance and Banking; Taxation, Accounting and Auditing

June 19, 2026; Cambridge, UK: X International Scientific and Practical Conference «EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF TODAY: INTERSECTORAL ISSUES AND DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCES»


FINANCIAL LITERACY DEFICIT AND THE EFFECTIVENESS OF NEW LENDING REGULATIONS IN GEORGIA


DOI
https://doi.org/10.36074/logos-19.06.2026.004
Published
30.06.2026

Abstract

This paper examines the dynamics of over-indebtedness among the Georgian population in the context of financial literacy levels and the responsible lending framework introduced in 2019. The relevance of the study is driven by the growing imbalance between the digital accessibility of financial products and consumers' rational financial behavior. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of administrative restrictions—specifically, Payment-to-Income (PTI) and Loan-to-Value (LTV) limits—in mitigating over-indebtedness when financial education remains low. Using a mixed-methods approach, the paper analyzes quantitative data from the National Bank of Georgia and Geostat (including NPL indices and household debt burdens from 2018 to 2025), alongside a comparative assessment of financial literacy surveys conducted by international organizations, such as the OECD. The findings indicate that while the responsible lending framework successfully reduced systemic risks and default rates within the formal banking sector, the deficit in financial literacy led to a migration of low-income borrowers toward less-regulated, informal financial markets. Consequently, individual over-indebtedness persisted outside the banking perimeter. The paper concludes with policy recommendations emphasizing the integration of an enhanced national financial education strategy as a critical complement to macroprudential regulations.

References

  1. Charaia, V., & Papava, V. (2022). Financial dollarization and its macro-financial implications for the Georgian economy. Caucasus Analytical Digest, (128), 3-9.
  2. D’Alessio, G., & Iezzi, S. (2013). Household over-indebtedness: Definition and measurement with Italian data. Bank of Italy Occasional Paper, (149). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2238470
  3. European Central Bank. (2020). The use of macroprudential instruments in the euro area. ECB Banking Supervision Report.
  4. International Monetary Fund. (2021). Macroprudential policy framework and tools in emerging market economies. IMF Policy Paper.
  5. Kakulia, M., & Asmatava, L. (2020). Challenges of financial inclusion and consumer protection in the non-banking financial sector of Georgia. Economic Profile, 15(1), 22-35. [in Georgian]
  6. Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2014). The economic importance of financial literacy: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(1), 5-44. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.52.1.5
  7. National Bank of Georgia. (2018). Financial Stability Report 2018. NBG Official Publications.
  8. National Bank of Georgia. (2018). Regulation on Physical Person Responsible Lending (Decree No. 281/04 of the Governor of the National Bank of Georgia). [in Georgian]
  9. National Bank of Georgia. (2024). Financial Stability Report 2024: Assessment of macroprudential policy and household debt burdens.
  10. National Statistics Office of Georgia (Geostat). (2025). Incomes, Expenditures and Material Well-being of Households in Georgia (Annual Report).
  11. OECD. (2018). OECD/INFE Toolkit for Measuring Financial Literacy and Financial Inclusion. OECD Publishing.
  12. OECD. (2020). Financial Literacy of Adults in Georgia: Evaluation of knowledge, behavior, and attitudes. OECD International Network on Financial Education (INFE).
  13. Schicks, J. (2013). The definition and causes of microfinance over-indebtedness: A customer protection framework. Oxford Development Studies, 41(sup1), S95-S116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2013.778237