ASSESSING THE DG ECHO INDEX FOR HUMANITARIAN OPERATIONS AND CONTEXTUALISATION OF IT IN THE UKRAINIAN CRISIS: THE IMPACT OF RUSSIA'S WAR AGAINST UKRAINE (COMMENCED IN 2022)
The devastating war in Ukraine has created an unprecedented humanitarian crisis, demanding a multifaceted response from humanitarian organizations. The DG ECHO Index, a widely used tool for assessing the effectiveness of humanitarian operations, has faced scrutiny for its applicability in complex crises like this. This chapter focuses on the efficacy of the DG ECHO Index in the Ukrainian context, exploring its strengths, limitations, and potential for improvement.Through a mixed-methods approach, this chapter delves into the lived experiences of humanitarian practitioners, analyzing qualitative data from semi-structured interviews. Additionally, it examines quantitative data on humanitarian operations in Ukraine, aiming to assess the index's effectiveness in capturing the nuances of complex crises.The chapter opens with a comprehensive overview of the DG ECHO Index, discussing its strengths and limitations. It then delves into the specific challenges posed by the Ukrainian crisis, highlighting the index's applicability in a multi-actor environment with numerous humanitarian programs operating simultaneously.The chapter further analyzes the 2023 adaptation of the DG ECHO Index by the Bureau Of Population, Refugees, & Migration, exploring its potential to address the identified limitations. By examining the impact of this adaptation, the chapter ultimately aims to provide valuable insights and recommendations for improving humanitarian evaluation tools and enhancing their effectiveness in complex crisis contexts.Thischaptercontributestotheongoingdialogueon the efficacy of the DG ECHO Index and the development of more effective tools for assessing humanitarian operations. By providing evidence-based recommendations and practical insights, this chapter seeks to empower humanitarian organizations operating in Ukraine to refine their response and address the unique challenges presented by the crisis.The Chapter's findings will be of interest to researchers, policymakers, humanitarian practitioners, and anyone concerned with improving the effectiveness of humanitarian response in complex crises like the war in Ukraine.
Посилання
Brusset, E. (2016). Measuring the Unmeasurable: The Impact of Humanitarian Aid. Routledge.
Featherstone, A. (2018). Quality and Accountability in Humanitarian Action: What are we Learning? Humanitarian Accountability Report.
Harvey, P. (2019). Aid and Bureaucracy: Reinterpreting the 2018 Humanitarian Reforms. Humanitarian Affairs Review.
Hedlund, K. (2017). Contextualizing Impact Evaluations in the Humanitarian Sector. Evaluation and Program Planning.
Hill, R. (2018). The Quest for Relevance and Coherence in Humanitarian Action. Journal of Humanitarian Assistance.
Hoddinott, J. (2014). The Importance of Transparency and Accuracy in Impact Evaluations. Public Administration and Development.
Konyndyk, J., Steckler, T., & Curry, D. (2017). Rethinking the Humanitarian Business Model. Center for Global Development.
Levine, S., & Chastre, C. (2018). Humanitarian Operational Modalities in Crisis Settings: Learning from Experience. Humanitarian Practice Network.
Maxwell, D., & Parker, J. (2020). Strengthening Local Capacities in Crisis Response. Feinstein International Center.
Patel, R. B., & Burke, T. F. (2019). Urban Health in Humanitarian Crises: Developing Populations. Journal of Urban Health.
Puri, J. et al. (2017). Disaggregated Data for Humanitarian Aid: A Guideline. International Initiative for Impact Evaluation.
Barnett, M., Weiss, T. G., & Campbell, S. W. (2014). Humanitarian crises and international responses. Springer.
Brown, D., & Donini, A. (2014). Rhetoric vs. reality: Evaluating the impact of humanitarian interventions. Kumarian Press.
Buchanan-Smith, M., & Scriven, K. (2011). Leading Edge? A review of OCHA's performance in humanitarian information management. ALNAP.
Cohen, C., & Werker, E. (2008). Humanitarian economics: how NGOs respond to crises. Harvard Business Review.
European Commission. (2017). DG ECHO's humanitarian aid policy and its implementation. EC.
Harmer, A., & Macrae, J. (2004). Beyond the continuum: The changing role of aid policy in protracted crises. HPG Report 18.
Hill, R. (2018). The quest for relevance and coherence in humanitarian action. Journal of Humanitarian Assistance.
Jachens, L., Houdmont, J., & Thomas, R. (2019). Efforts to improve humanitarian staff well-being in war zones. Disasters Journal.
Konyndyk, J., Steckler, T., & Curry, D. (2017). Rethinking the humanitarian business model. Center for Global Development.
Stoddard, A., Harmer, A., & Renouf, J. S. (2021). Providing aid in insecure environments: Trends in volatility and the implications for humanitarian action. HPG Policy Briefs.
UN OCHA. (2019). State of the Humanitarian System. OCHA.
United Nations OCHA. (n.d.). Ukraine Situation Reports. Retrieved from OCHA's Ukraine Situation Reports
Humanitarian Policy Group (HPG), Overseas Development Institute (ODI). (2020). The State of the Humanitarian System 2020. Retrieved from ODI Publications
European Union Monitoring Mission Ukraine (EUMM). (n.d.). Special Reports on Humanitarian Aid Effectiveness. Retrieved from EUMM Ukraine
USAID. (n.d.). 2019-2020 Ukraine Humanitarian Response Evaluation. Retrieved from USAID Development Experience Clearinghouse
European Commission DG ECHO. (n.d.). ECHO Factsheet – Ukraine. Retrieved from EC DG ECHO Ukraine
Статті цього автора (авторів), які найбільше читають
