Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Sociology and Statistics

February 14, 2025; Boston, USA: VII International Scientific and Practical Conference «SCIENTIFIC PRACTICE: MODERN AND CLASSICAL RESEARCH METHODS»


FROM ACTIONS TO IMPACT: A GUIDE TO EFFECTIVE ACTIVITY REPORTING


DOI
https://doi.org/10.36074/logos-14.02.2025.048
Published
15.03.2025

Abstract

Inaccurate activity reporting can hinder project success, leading to misinterpretations of progress and ineffective decision-making. This document addresses this challenge by providing a practical framework for designing and reporting on activities in a way that accurately reflects project progress and impact. We will discuss best practices for defining measurable activities, selecting appropriate indicators, and ensuring that reporting clearly links activities to project goals and outcomes.

References

  1. Annecke, W. (2008). Monitoring and evaluation of energy for development: The good, the bad and the questionable in M&E practice. Energy Policy, 36(8), 2839-2845.
  2. Canibano, L., & Paloma Sánchez, M. (2009). Intangibles in universities: current challenges for measuring and reporting. Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, 13(2), 93-104.
  3. Crawley, K. D. (2017). The six-sphere framework: A practical tool for assessing monitoring and evaluation systems. African Evaluation Journal, 5(1).
  4. Kuchenmüller, T., Chapman, E., Takahashi, R., Lester, L., Reinap, M., Ellen, M., & Haby, M. M. (2022). A comprehensive monitoring and evaluation framework for evidence to policy networks. Evaluation and program planning, 91, 102053.
  5. Lamhauge, N., Lanzi, E., & Agrawala, S. (2013). The use of indicators for monitoring and evaluation of adaptation: lessons from development cooperation agencies. Climate and Development, 5(3), 229-241.
  6. Maimula, S. (2017). Challenges in practicing monitoring and evaluation: The case of local government water projects in Mkuranga, Tanzania (Doctoral dissertation, The Open University of Tanzania).
  7. Markiewicz, A., & Patrick, I. (2015). Developing monitoring and evaluation frameworks. Sage Publications.
  8. Mosher, A. (2009). Good, but how good. Monitoring and Evaluation of Media Assistance Projects. Washington DC: Center for International Media Assistance. URL: http://bit.ly/1pAkRFt.
  9. Myrick, D. (2013). A logical framework for monitoring and evaluation: a pragmatic approach to M&E. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(14), 423-428.
  10. Sawadogo-Lewis, T., Bryant, R., & Roberton, T. (2022). NGO perspectives on the challenges and opportunities for real-world evaluation: a qualitative study. Global health action, 15(1), 2088083.