Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Philosophy and Political science

May 24, 2024; Zurich, Switzerland: VI International Scientific and Practical Conference «GRUNDLAGEN DER MODERNEN WISSENSCHAFTLICHEN FORSCHUNG»


MODERNIZATION OF INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE INFORMATION SPHERE AS A CONDITION OF GENUINE SOVEREIGNTY


DOI
https://doi.org/10.36074/logos-24.05.2024.069
Published
09.06.2024

Abstract

The Internet not only provides a wealth of information and helps identify primary sources. For example, it also aggravates the problem of information noise and selection of what is needed, makes it easier to juggle facts to suit the customer’s needs, throw in fragments of lies and create plausible illusions. The consistent spread of the principles and principles of capitalism, in particular, to the sphere of power and management, is corruption. Attempts to “ennoble” corruption lead to the emergence of a variety of “lobbyism,” which naturally intensifies with the formation of both the militarism of the military-industrial complex and the social Darwinism of financial speculative schemers. Both use all the levers of manipulation of public consciousness, the range of which has increased in the era of the Internet and social networks. Thus, the cultivation of “smiley culture” not only simplifies and impoverishes the nature of relationships, but also reduces and reduces the level of social life, as well as group and individual needs and requests. That is, expanding the tools of information influence to ensure real sovereignty and independent decision-making to realize one’s interests requires both the education of the social consciousness of the people and the creation of an adequate protective infrastructure using the developments of public-private partnerships [1-5]. Betrayal of human ideals of Good, Justice, Truth, renunciation of dignity and honour, oblivion of one’s abilities is a sin and a crime. Interference and distortion of information flows, the construction of analytical membranes and means of influence are included in the programming of consciousness. Of course, the strengthening of trends in the formation of a “smart society”, “knowledge society”, etc. leads to an increase in the social and individual sound of information, its perception, processing and dissemination. In particular, the “information boom” has multiplied the impact of virtual worlds on the state and dynamics of the real world. Directed changes in associative perception threaten to distort understanding, and therefore increase the likelihood of triggering threatening scenarios. On the contrary, their interruption and extinction is an organic element of bringing them into the orbit of development. Today, the information avalanche and the accessibility of the ideological vastness provide a new meaning to Heraclitus’ formula “much knowledge does not teach the mind”: it is not difficult to gain access to a sea of diverse information, but the value of the ability to create, as well as talent, basic knowledge and methodology that allows you to select indicators. Accordingly, for successful implementation of strategies it is necessary to ensure the speed and volume of obtaining the necessary (primarily high-quality and objective) information. The potential of the social level of information impact for both the development and degradation of humanity is growing [6-16]. For example, the spread of the Internet community significantly influences the range of media technologies and increases the proportion of information training in organizational culture. The “information boom” makes it urgent to strengthen the information infrastructure, allowing, in particular, to counter the flows from the global media and highlight socially significant information from the waves of “grey noise”. “Membranes” between cultural-civilizational worlds during the movement of information have both a spontaneous nature (associated primarily with the basic value-sense complexes) and purposeful actions to select useful and prevent harmful influences (in particular, due to the infrastructural complex of information exchange).

References

  1. Желнов, М.В. (1981). Предмет философии в истории философии. Предыстория. М.: Изд-во Моск. ун-та.
  2. Уледов, А.К. (1980). Духовная жизнь общества. Методологические проблемы исследования. М.: Мысль.
  3. Барулин, В.С. (1977). Соотношение материального и идеального в обществе. М.: Политиздат.
  4. Шедяков, В.Є. (2013). Взаєморезонування людського та соціального капіталу в структурі соціокультурного антропогенезу. Гілея, (71 / 4), 565-571.
  5. Шедяков, В.Е. (2016). Создание привлекательных условий жизни и благоприятных для творчества предпосылок – цель и условие долгосрочного эндогенного социально-экономического развития при формировании «умного общества». The Development of International Competitiveness: State, Region, Enterprise: Proceed. of Intern. Scient. Conf. Lisbon, (II), 34-36.
  6. Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and Power. New York: J. Wiley.
  7. Аронсон, Э., Пратканис, Э. (2008). Современные технологии влияния и убеждения. Эпоха пропаганды. СПб.: Прайм-ЕВРОЗНАК.
  8. Fulbright, J. (1970). The Pentagon Propaganda Machine. New York: Liveright.
  9. Engdahl, F.W. (2012). Myths, Lies and Oil Wars. Wiesbaden: Edition Engdahl.
  10. Большаков, В.В. (1984). Агрессия против разума. М.: Мол. гвардия.
  11. Шедяков, В.Е. (2020). Опасности манипулирования сквозь призму налаживания гражданского полилога. Politicus, (5), 106-112. DOI https://doi.org/10.24195/2414-9616.2020-5.17
  12. Шедяков, В.Е. (2016). Формирование умного общества и расширение оснований контрманипулятивных практик. Час вибору: виклики інформ. епохи / Івакін, О.А., Яковлев Д.В. (ред.). Одеса: Гельветика, 196-216.
  13. Shedyakov, V. (2023). Reflexivity in understanding and managing as a need for productive cybersocialization and deep tech in a network society. Management of socio-economic transformations of business processes: current realities, global challenges, forecast scenarios and development prospects. Sofia: Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 42-57. DOI https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10461560
  14. Шедяков, В.Е. (2016). Изменения медийного пространства в стратегии сетецентрического воздействия. Суспільні науки: сучасні тенденції та фактори розвитку: Матер. Міжнар. наук.-практ. конф. Одеса, 110-114.
  15. Shedyakov, V. (2022). Post-globality as a changing of condition of international and domestic opportunities and threats. Current issues of security management during martial law. Košice: Vysoká škola bezpečnostného manažérstva v Košiciach, 46-57. DOI https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7231597
  16. Шедяков, В.Е. (2020). Постглобальные возможности и угрозы: диапазон решений. Economic Development: Global Trends and National Peculiarities / Pawlik, A., Shaposhnykov, K. (eds.). Kielce: Baltija Publishing, 261-275. DOI 10.30525/978-9934-588-61-7-18
  17. Engdahl, F.W. (2018). Manifest Destiny: Democracy as Cognitive Dissonance, Wiesbaden: mine.books.
  18. Балакірєва, О. (2007). Трансформація ціннісних орієнтацій в українському суспільстві. Український соціум, (2 / 19), 7-19.
  19. Шилов, В.В., Семёнова, М.Н., Сергеева, Т.Н. (2016). Ценностные ориентации двух поколений. Власть, (24 – 2), 141-149.
  20. Шедяков, В.Є. (2012). Життєві цінності населення в контексті перспектив модернізації країни. Соціальна психологія, (1-2), 11-20.
  21. Шедяков, В.Е. (2016). Политическая рефлексия ценностно-смыслового пространства и осуществление геостратегической самоидентификации. Politicus, (1), 178-185.
  22. Shedyakov, V. (2023). Social and individual levels of transformations in the transition period. Prospects for sustainable development and ensuring the security of economic systems in the new geostrategic realities. Košice: Vysoká škola bezpečnostného manažérstva v Košiciach, 209-221. DOI https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10436672
  23. Шедяков, В.Е. (2019). Информационная составляющая конкурентной войны за рынки: место социальных технологий. Інституціональна трансформація розвитку економіки України / Гальцова, О.Л. (ред.). Запоріжжя – Херсон: Гельветика, 113-128.
  24. Шедяков, В.Е. (2018). Социальный уровень информационного влияния: стратегическая культура и управленческие композиции. Social sciences: development prospects in countries of Europe at the beginning of the third millennium. Stalowa Wola – Riga: Baltija Publishing, 157-174.
  25. Shedyakov, V. (2019). Social technologies and communications: basic trends of changes. Scientific Development of New Eastern Europe: Proceed. of Intern. Scient. Conf. Riga, (I), 128-130. DOI https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-571-89-3_45
  26. Шедяков, В.Е. (2017). Ресурсный диапазон информационного взаимодействия: стратегические коммуникации общества сквозь призму дрейфа гуманизма. Актуальні проблеми філософії та соціології, (15), 163-166.
  27. Шедяков, В.Е. (2018). Реальность под давлением виртуального: взаиморезонирование материального и идеального. Нові завдання суспільних наук у XXI столітті: Матер. Міжнар. наук.-практ. конф. Київ, 44-48.