The nature of domestic and foreign policy is fundamentally the same. The transitional characteristic traits of socio-political systems leave own mark. If the external balance of power and competition of systems generated additional impulses for expanding the basket of workers' rights, then the moment of a unipolar world order doomed the ruling groups to degradation, absolute and relative impoverishment of the broad masses of people, lack of development prospects and increased parasitism, and, accordingly, to an aggravating multi-level split in society. The usurpation of the people's will was contradictory; different individuals and groups had different interests and were guided by different approaches. But the boundaries of actions permitted to the ruling groups by the people fluctuate (including under the influence of protest confrontations). The use of “grey” schemes and illegal methods bordering on trampling on international and national law naturally causes either mirror reactions or asymmetric responses. And these processes obviously enter the problematic field of observing equality and real sovereignty of rights, as well as the position of the broad masses of workers [1-7].
